Is This Really David Beckham?
This is allegedly a leaked photo of David Beckham from an upcoming issue of Attitude magazine which is an English gay magazine. According to People magazine:
After posing for the cover of Attitude, an English gay magazine, David Beckham, who is known for wearing his wife’s nail polish and underwear, tells Sports Illustrated that “being a gay icon is a great honor for me. I’m quite sure of my feminine side, and I’ve not got a problem with that at all. These days it’s the norm, and it should be.”
I doubt this is really him, I don’t think Becks is that hairy.
6 babblicious comments:
I don’t think it is him either. The tattoos don’t look authentic and he has tattoos on his right arm that don’t even appear on this image. And you’re right about the “too hairy” comment.
That is not David Beckham!!! Not at all. They wish he would do them a favor an grace their cover but sorry that is definitely photo shopped!!! I totally agree with you those legs are way to hairy to be David’s!!!
There is a gay model/porn actor named Ray Dragon who posed for this. If I remember to I’ll send you the link later. These are pictures of his body, with Beck’s head photoshopped or whatever they always do with Mariah, & Oprah & everyone else.
that positions too gay for a straight man even for david beckham oy
of course that’s david beckham. ask any of us who have been in the locker room with him. and yes he’s that fuzzy…
this would have had to be taken years ago
the angel tattoo has had wings for a few years now alus he has had about twelve more since